And I said that his daughters were his high priced hookers? And some people thought I was making a mountain out of a molehill?
Well HE’S NOTHING BUT A PIMP.
Yeah, you can explain away his allowing his 9 year old daughter to swing around stripper poles and dress in dominatrix boots and fishnets at public events, fine. But can you explain away his decision to allow her to front a ‘children’s lingerie line‘? [Edit: Apparently it's not children's lingerie, it's just tutus. The collection is fronted by Emily Grace, Noah Cyrus' best friend but is advertised by both girls.]
NO YOU CANNOT.
You stand corrected.
You can call me a lot of things, but never a prude. That just wouldn’t make any sense. I am extremely liberal, I believe that sex isn’t something to be shied away from. I have age appropriate conversations with my daughters about all topics, sexuality included. But if something is supposed to be for adults, it should be for adults – if it’s for children, it should be for children. This is why we don’t watch Hannah Montana in this house, even though I’ll let them watch Kill Bill. There is a difference between kid stuff, which they will emulate and admire much more than adult stuff, because my kids know the difference between what’s ok for them and what’s not. Miley Cyrus blurs that line and I won’t have that, so no Hannah Montana (they come as a package deal). Have you seen her outfits and actions on stage at her concerts for LITTLE GIRLS?!
Yeah, no. Not in my damn house.
Billy Ray Cyrus is a pimp. There is no excuse for little girls acting like that right under his nose. And all those business and publicity decisions are supposed to go right through him, so there’s no excuse: he’s selling their souls sexuality for money and fame. That’s disgusting.
{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }
That is repulsive.
We banned HM here too.
I see Miley on the online gossip sites ALL the time, and I just sort of skim. I heard the girl speak once with Jonathan Ross and had to turn it off after about 5 sentences. I’m not too up to date with the rest of the family but when I saw you mention the lingerie thing I was like oh now it can’t be that bad. Then I clicked the link..
What in the fresh hell?!!
First of all, what a funny looking kid. Secondly, wow. Her mother lets her out of the house dressed like that? I am not a parent but I do have eyes and even I can see that’s wrong on so many levels.
You’re right, this one is going to be hell on wheels and not in the too distant future either!
Man, Billy Ray makes Joe Simpson look like Father of the Year. I used to think Papa Joe was pimping out his daughters, but at least they were, you know, out of grade school.
This load of shit coming from the Cyrus pimp machine makes me very, very glad I don’t have any girls.
Remember the days when we thought Britney Spears was a poor oversexed role model for young girls? She now seems like child’s play (no pun intended) compared to this disgusting train wreck.
Couldn’t have said it better…except that I don’t have kids yet, and I feel lucky that I don’t have to monitor this kind of nonsense just yet!
That poor younger kid is just goofy looking, too. Well so is Miley, actually.
Seriously.
You can cut the mullet off the man but you can’t take the redneck tendencies away.
I don’t even understand what I just wrote.
But ewwwwww.
That is one funny looking little girl. Anyway… lingerie for kids, seriously? We’re promoting kiddie porn in 2010? I just don’t get what’s cute or appealing about making your children “sexual beings” before they really get what that phrase means. It robs them of their innocence. At least when they’re meth addicts their father will have set aside plenty of money to fuel their addictions. -___-
I don’t have girls but if I did that shit wouldn’t be allowed in MY house, either. I might ban Vanity Fair, too. Just sayin.
(P.S. How much do I love this “edit your comment” deal? SO MUCH. I mean, I may still leave a jackass comment, but at least it’s a TYPO-FREE jackass comment.)
My daughter, who will be 5 in 2 weeks, just happens to be named Hannah. She has never seen Hannah Montana in action, but she is aware of her, and she is convinced that the fact they share a name is like a Sign from God on High. This makes me sad. And squeamish. She isn’t even 5 yet, this is not a good role model. And you’re right, her parents should do a better job of policing that.
Wow! What a fucking shame.
Other questionable career moves aside.. this one is actually untrue. Ooh La La is a little company (2 moms I think) who make tu-tu’s like the ones little girls are wearing over leggings and jeans lately- and I understand it is Noah’s little friend who is doing it- not even Noah. Just because Perez Hilton writes something doesn’t make it true. Unfortunately- for the little company and the mom’s who own it- this rumor has been devastating. I know you wouldn’t intentionally spread gossip wuthout having your facts on straight.
All the other stuff though.. the pole- the stripper moves and ass hanging out of her “shorts”- no bueno- Billy Ray has lost his everloving mind.
February 5, 2010 at 8:01 am
I wouldn’t, not at all. I looked on the website and found except some hideously patterned tutu dresses, but I figured that they had just not debuted the collection on their website yet.
There was a video on the MSN site I linked to, which I now see is private (I’m wondering why?), with the girl who the collection is named after discussing it (and ignoring what SHE was dressed in in the video – OMG when did little girls start wearing fishnet stockings?! WHERE WAS I WHEN THIS WAS APPROVED?!) it didn’t sound like she was talking about just tutus.
I feel badly if their business suffers for this, I’ll make an amendment to my post. Maybe they’ll think twice about letting those little sexpots be the faces of their clothing line if they only make and sell things that are age appropriate. Those little girls are REALLY not examples of that and the sales Ooh! La, La! would get would be, in my opinion, won off of the backs of two kids that are being pimped out and probably don’t even realize it.
It’s just the one little girl- can’t remember her name- Noah’s little friend. Apparently she is a recurring character on the Hanna Montana show- this little homespun company probably figured they had hit the jackpot getting a semi-sort-of famous spokesperson who is in the age-range of their demographic… not realizing that the limited- off screen exposure of this child includes her wearing very non- age appropriate- stripper halloween costumes and skimpy swimwear. Can’t blame Billy Ray for this girl- she’s got her own parents whp are out of their ever-loving minds!
February 5, 2010 at 4:07 pm
It’s both Noah and Emily Grace promoting the line, according to the Ooh! La, La! website:
“The Emily Grace Collection will be launched in Emily’s new show co-starring bestfriend, Noah Cyrus. Both Emily and Noah will wear pieces from the collection as they travel with the Miley Cyrus Wonder World Tour promoting their “Noie and Ems Show”, seen exclusively on MileyWorld.com.”
These parents are all apart of the same twisted reality, obviously. I don’t understand it.
Here’s the actual boutique website and the real press release with the actual items being plugged by Noah’s little friend
http://www.oohlalacouture.com
I’ve noticed that other bloggers have made attempts to get their facts straight after originally going with the unchecked rumor. It just frustrates me when people go off half-cocked and innocent people and businesses suffer. I mean- all the media and blogs who jumped on this like sharks can now say, “oops- we weren’t quite right.. but Miley and her sister DO dress like whores” (nevermind that neither Miley OR her sister are even involved in this in reality)- but really- damage is already done.